149–164 (2006)īutt, M., Dyvik, H., King, T.H., Masuichi, H., Rohrer, C.: The parallel grammar project. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Language Learning (CoNLL), New York, NY, pp. MIT Press, Cambridge (1982)īuchholz, S., Marsi, E.: CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. Springer, The Netherlands (2003)īresnan, J.: The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations.
Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol. (ed.) Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora. 69–76 (1999)īrants, T., Skut, W., Uszkoreit, H.: Syntactic annotation of a German newspaper corpus. In: Proceedings of the ATALA Treebank Workshop, Paris, France, pp. 49–57 (1998)īrants, T., Skut, W., Uszkoreit, H.: Syntactic annotation of a German newspaper corpus. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference on New Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Language Learning. 224–231 (2000)īrants, T., Skut, W.: Automation of treebank annotation. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing ANLP-2000, Seattle, Washington, pp. In: Proceedings of Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation LREC-2000, Athens, Greece (2000)īrants, T.: TnT – a statistical part-of-speech tagger. 118–125 (1999)īrants, T.: Inter-annotator agreement for a German newspaper corpus. In: Proceedings of EACL-99, Bergen, Norway, pp. CLAUS Report No. 98, īrants, T.: Cascaded Markov models. Universität des Saarlandes, Computational Linguistics, Saarbrücken, Germany (1997). Comput., Special Issue 2(4), 597–620 (2004)īrants, T.: The NeGra Export Format for Annotated Corpora. 1643–1649 (2002)īrants, S., Dipper, S., Eisenberg, P., Hansen-Schirra, S., König, E., Lezius, W., Rohrer, C., Smith, G., Uszkoreit, H.: TIGER: linguistic interpretation of a German corpus. In: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation LREC-02, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, pp. 37–60 (2012)īrants, S., Hansen, S.: Developments in the TIGER annotation scheme and their realization in the corpus. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), Lisbon, Portugal, pp.
Ohio business license civit initiatives iso#
īosch, S., Choi, K.-S., de la Clergerie, É., Fang, A.C., Faaß, G., Lee, K., Pareja-Lora, A., Romary, L., Witt, A., Zeldes, A., Zipser, F.: \(\) as a standardised serialisation for ISO 24615 – SynAF. Technical report, Universität des Saarlandes, Universität Stuttgart and Universität Potsdam (2003). KeywordsĪlbert, S., Anderssen, J., Bader, R., Becker, S., Bracht, T., Brants, S., Brants, T., Demberg, V., Dipper, S., Eisenberg, P., Hansen, S., Hirschmann, H., Janitzek, J., Kirstein, C., Langner, R., Michelbacher, L., Plaehn, O., Preis, C., Pußel, M., Rower, M., Schrader, B., Schwartz, A., Smith, G., Uszkoreit, H.: TIGER Annotationsschema. We also discuss the usage of both treebanks, as well as other German treebanks, and we present a comparison of the two annotation schemes along with their advantages and disadvantages. We describe the projects in which the two treebanks were annotated, discuss the respective annotation schemes, the processes used for annotation, and the data formats. This chapter presents two major treebanks of German, TIGER and TüBa-D/Z. This makes German a good choice for a comparative analysis of treebanks. All treebanks use a combination of constituent structure and grammatical functions, but the decisions with regard to other phenomena differ significantly, for example in the treatment of discontinuous structures. Additionally, German has four existing major treebanks, which differ considerably in their syntactic annotation schemes. German is a language that is closely related to English but has a richer morphology and freer word order than English.
0 kommentar(er)
